<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Yostivanich &#187; election2008</title> <atom:link href="http://www.yostivanich.com/tag/election2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.yostivanich.com</link> <description>Surfing the web and hopefully learning something new every day</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.yostivanich.com/?pushpress=hub'/> <item><title>This Republican Party Bothers Me</title><link>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/09/29/this-republican-party-bothers-me/</link> <comments>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/09/29/this-republican-party-bothers-me/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Justin Yost</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[biden]]></category> <category><![CDATA[election]]></category> <category><![CDATA[election2008]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category> <category><![CDATA[obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[palin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[republican]]></category> <category><![CDATA[usa]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yostivanich.com/?p=272</guid> <description><![CDATA[(I am a registered independent and my views align with the Libertarian, Republican, and Democratic Parties, yes, all at once. I consider myself a social libertarian, something I conjured up on my own to explain my views, which are too complex to explain here.) The Republican Party of the United States over the past several [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I am a registered independent and my views align with the Libertarian, Republican, and Democratic Parties, yes, all at once. I consider myself a social libertarian, something I conjured up on my own to explain my views, which are too complex to explain here.)</p><p>The <a
title="RNC.org" href="http://www.rnc.org/">Republican Party</a> of the United States over the past several years has bothered me, more and more.</p><p>The party has in the past years undergone a change that I believe will not cause the party to gain more unity, but rather cause more people to split from the party. The party has been pretty consistent in only area, everywhere else it says and does two very different things. The party also seems to be promoting the idea that logic and intelligence are flawed qualities in a politician. Wikipedia (as normal in this day and age) has more sources and more information than I could hope to convey regarding this so <a
title="Wikipedia: Republican Party" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)">go look there for more details</a>.</p><p>My largest problem with the party has been a promotion of people who genuinely appear to know nothing about <a
title="SFGate.com: Palin on Alaska and Russia" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&amp;entry_id=30754">how proximity doesn&#8217;t equal experience</a>, <a
title="America Blog.com - McCain admits he knows nothing about economics" href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/john-mccain-who-admits-he-knows-nothing.html">economics</a>, <a
title="AOL News" href="http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2008/09/19/john-mccain-knows-nothing-about-foreign-affairs/">international affairs</a>, or it seems just about anything <a
title="YouTube: Bill Maher - Palin's religious views" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etEOVapKZgQ">other than religion</a> or <a
title="YouTube: Sarah Palin - Lipstick and Hockey Moms" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq7kBcA5q1w">lipstick</a>. I am genuinely bothered when opponents paint Obama as an <a
title="WashingtonPost.com: Opponents Paint Obama as an Elitist" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/04/12/ST2008041200232.html">elitist to win an election</a>. I want an elitist President, I want a President so ridiculously smart and intelligent I can&#8217;t even hope to follow him/her. I want a President <a
title="Bad Astronomy: McCain's Science Policy" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/22/mccains-science-policy/">who believes</a> <a
title="Bad Astronomy: Obama's Science Policy" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/08/obamas-science-policy/">in science</a>, a President <a
title="ScriptingNews.com: Everyone Laughed But" href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/15/everyoneLaughedBut.html">who is curious beyond anyone else I know</a>, a President who sees the <a
title="ScienceBlogs.com: Big Picture Debate Commentary" href="http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2008/09/bigpicture_debate_commentary.php">world as the complex system it really is</a>, I want a <a
title="Wikipedia: Polymath" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath">Renaissance President</a>. And yes I do want a President that actually causes excitement amongst both this nation and other nations. Let&#8217;s face it we can&#8217;t do everything on our own, we do not rule the world, not by far. Especially in the face of our declining economic strength and political power in the world (<a
title="Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire (Paperback)" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FColossus-Rise-Fall-American-Empire%2Fdp%2F0143034790%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1222668493%26sr%3D8-1&amp;tag=yostivanichco-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">awesome book on this subject</a><img
style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=yostivanichco-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />).</p><p>Most of all, I want a President who expresses a belief and actually applies it fully. This is one of the largest reasons why I can&#8217;t vote for a Republican the majority of the time. As I stated at the beginning of this post, I do believe in some of the views that the Republican party expresses, but they don&#8217;t apply those views.</p><ul><li><a
title="Wikipedia: Republican Party" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)">Limited Government</a>: <a
title="AntiWar.com: Homeland Security" href="http://www.antiwar.com/paul/paul56.html">Homeland Security was the largest increase in the federal government since the Dept. of Defense and WWII</a></li><li><a
title="Women’s Health News: One From the Debate" href="http://womenshealthnews.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/one-from-the-debate/">No Government intervention between you and your doctor</a>: See Abortion</li><li><a
title="National Review: Newt Gingrich on the Bailout Bill" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZGE5MmE0YmRiODA3YTRiNzFlN2FmNDU5N2I0ZDc3YTE=">Congress should have time to review bills and needs oversight over the President</a>: <a
title="Center for Democracy and Technology: Patriot Act" href="http://www.cdt.org/security/usapatriot/031027cdt.shtml" class="broken_link">The Patriot Act was approved by the House of Rep. hours after being revised in the middle of the night</a></li><li><a
title="Wikipedia: Republican Party" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)">Less Federal Control, more State Control</a>: DOJ under Bush pushes for Federal Government to have final say on <a
title="NYT: Drug Label, Maimed Patient and Crucial Test for Justices " href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/us/19scotus.html">drugs</a> or <a
title="BBC News: California sues US Govt." href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7086121.stm">environment.</a></li><li><a
title="Yahoo News: Ad: Palin more qualified than Obama " href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080903/pl_politico/13111">Proclaiming that their candidates have executive experience and can run a business</a>: <a
title="Scripting.com: Could Sarah Palin Run Hewlett" href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/16/couldSarahPailinRunHewlett.html">HP former exec. Carly Fiorina said neither McCain nor Palin could have run HP.</a></li><li><a
title="GOP.com: 2008 Platform - Education" href="http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Education.htm">Education</a>: Uhh the entire point of this post</li><li><a
title="GOP.com: 2008 Platform - Government Reform" href="http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/GovernmentReform.htm#9">Appointing Judges who don&#8217;t interpret the Constitution</a>: <a
title="TomPaine.com: The activist judge myth" href="http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/08/14/the_activist_judge_myth.php">You know except when</a> <a
title="Raising Kane.com: Debunking McCain &amp; The Activist Judge Myth" href="http://www.raisingkaine.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=14197" class="broken_link">they want the</a> Constitution to fit their ideas</li><li><a
title="Wikipedia: Pro-life" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-life">Party of Pro-life</a>: <a
title="huffingtonpost.com: Palin on Abortion" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-on-abortion-id-oppo_n_122924.html">Except when it comes to you know the mother</a> (I dated a girl who if she became pregnant will most likely die, so not only will she not be able to get an abortion <a
title="guardian.co.uk: US election: Advocates hope Bristol Palin's pregnancy will open US sex education debate" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/02/uselections2008.palin">but she can&#8217;t learn about ways to not get pregnant</a>, so just never have sex is what I guess she is supposed to do.)</li><li><a
title="Wikipedia: Republican Party" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)">Limited Spending by the Government</a>: <a
title="Cato: The Grand Old Spending Party" href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3750">Have you looked at our deficit?</a></li><li><a
title="GOP.com: 2008 Platform - Values" href="http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Values.htm#4">Freedom of Speech</a>: <a
href="http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0520-05.htm">You know</a> <a
href="http://www.sptimes.com/2002/11/03/TampaBay/7_protesters_arrested.shtml">except when</a> <a
href="http://www.progressive.org/mag_mcdubuque">people might</a> <a
href="http://www.michigandaily.com/content/getting-bounced-grand-old-partys-parties">disagree with you</a>.</li><li>How about just simply raising the level of discourse of the election: I took a look at the RNC.org Homepage and observed 8 different promoted items on the main flash window (4 Attack, 1 pro-McCain, 1 Donate, and 2 to Organize). When you only have one ad to promote your platform &#8211; that doesn&#8217;t raise the discourse level in this country. For comparison the DNC has 4 main ads (1 attack, 2 pro-Obama, 1 Fact Check both anti-McCain and pro-Obama).</li></ul><p>What is going on with a party that as far as I can tell says one thing and does another except when it comes to religion? The only thing that the party seems to actually say and do regards <a
title="Wikipedia: Social Conservative" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservatism#Present_social_conservative_issues_in_the_United_States">social conservative positions</a>.</p><p>This party needs to find itself and figure out what it really believes or work out some new form of logic to explain the disconnect between what they say and do.</p><p>Most of all a party that believes in the idea that one religion is somehow righter than everybody else and that the rest of the country should fall into line with a religious belief. Let&#8217;s get one thing right &#8211; Social Conservatives ultimately believe in their views not because it makes sense or they have the evidence to back it up, but because their religion says this is the way things should be. Their religion doesn&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t dictate my life. It&#8217;s freedom of religion &#8211; not freedom to have religion pushed on you. How does homosexuals being <a
title="YouTube: Sykes on gay Marriage" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4oGKm8Upp8">allowed to marry</a> <a
title="huffingtonpost.com: Top 10 Ways Gay Marriage Harms Straight People" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nato-green/top-10-ways-gay-marriage_b_115709.html">harm their marriage</a>? I also didn&#8217;t realize I needed to be reminded to pray in school.</p><p>If I was a member of the RNC I would be embarrassed by Sarah Palin just as any Democrat should have been embarrassed by Kerry in 2004. We shouldn&#8217;t be embarrassed by our candidates, we should be proud of them.</p><p>Intelligence and logic should be first qualifications for a candidate something the Republican Party seems to ignore as far as I can tell, though I would love to hear otherwise.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/09/29/this-republican-party-bothers-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: www.yostivanich.com @ 2010-07-31 16:14:36 -->