<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Yostivanich &#187; sexual education</title> <atom:link href="http://www.yostivanich.com/tag/sexual-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.yostivanich.com</link> <description>Surfing the web and hopefully learning something new every day</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.yostivanich.com/?pushpress=hub'/> <item><title>Abortion Should Be Rare</title><link>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/08/13/abortion-should-be-rare/</link> <comments>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/08/13/abortion-should-be-rare/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Justin Yost</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sexual]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sexual education]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yostivanich.com/?p=253</guid> <description><![CDATA[Feministing has a post up today regarding abortion and the Democrats new platform (PDF warning) for the 2008 election. The whole of the article essentially focuses on how &#8220;safe, legal and rare&#8221; has become &#8220;safe and legal&#8221;. My main area of concern is as follows: The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
title="Feministing.com" href="http://www.feministing.com/">Feministing</a> <a
title="Feministing: http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network Liberal Prose BlogAds Network Dem's drop &quot;safe, legal and rare&quot; language from abortion position" href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/010310.html">has a post up today</a> regarding abortion and the <a
title="Democratic 2008 Platform" href="http://www.queerty.com/wp/docs/2008/08/2008-democratic-platform-080808.pdf">Democrats new platform</a> (PDF warning) for the 2008 election. The whole of the article essentially focuses on how &#8220;safe, legal and rare&#8221; has become &#8220;safe and legal&#8221;. My main area of concern is as follows:</p><blockquote><p>The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman&#8217;s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.</p></blockquote><p>I wonder why the Democratic leadership removed the word &#8220;rare&#8221; in their platform for this upcoming election. First is that <a
title="Obama.com: Women Issues" href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/womenissues">Obama has been</a> a <a
title="OnTheIssues" href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm">pretty strong supporter of comprehensive</a> sex-ed as well as supporting contracteptives. Second it seems that having the word rare in there adds to a wider range of appeal. I would argue <a
title="NOW: Abortion" href="http://www.now.org/issues/abortion/">there are very few</a> <a
title="NARAL: Prevention" href="http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/take-action/prevention/">supporters of abortion</a> who want abortion to be a non-rare event. Instead the majority of pro-choice postions support compresenhive sex-ed and cheap and open access to contraceptives to reduce abortion. Why not, the fewer abortions the less of a controversial issue it becomes. <a
title="Yostivanich.com: Hey Let's Get Smart People" href="http://www.yostivanich.com/2007/10/18/hey-lets-get-smart-people/">Get smart people</a> and increased contracaptives mean fewer abortions which works for both parties.</p><p>So I must ask the Democratic Party why the change in language, it seems you are both going against what makes good political and logical sense? Or is there a secondary reason that I am not seeing?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.yostivanich.com/2008/08/13/abortion-should-be-rare/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: www.yostivanich.com @ 2010-07-31 16:21:52 -->